Independent inventions of a similar device or method by separate groups is a highly common phenomenon in the development of technology. Indeed, the concept of simultaneous, multiple or parallel discovery and invention, developed to examine such cases, is well known and has attracted considerable scholarly attention. Yet, most of it concentrated on discoveries. Inventions received less attention. This is unfortunate since the multiplicity of inventions allows the historian comparing the paths of the different groups involved and teaches us thereby both on the resources that the inventions required and the social, technical and other factors that motivated the research towards them. By discussing the results of pre-circulated drafts papers of close historical studies of specific duplications, we aim to surpass truisms like ‘inventions are the product of their time’ by indicating the specific factors that made these inventions feasible and desirable at particular time and place. Moreover, these studies will help to indicate conditions under which multiple inventions are more likely to appear, and thus to better understand the process of invention and technological development in general.

Our studies range from re-examining famous multiples, like that of the telephone to exploring unexamined ones like that of the dye-laser. In response to criticism about the concept of multiples, to unjustified claimed of alleged multiples in the literature and to neglect of genuine multiples in other cases, we offer a concrete and careful historical and conceptual analysis of the cases. Each invention is examined within its contemporary understanding and context, to determine what was its novelty, and to what extent was it a multiple. The degree of similarity needed and the exchange of knowledge between the groups allowed for inventions to be regarded as multiples are examined through the particular cases. To this end we suggest precise and concrete definitions of the inventions on their technical part and their function. Such a definition turns out to be crucial for understanding the process of invention.

Speakers:
Luise Allendorf-Hoefer (Deutsches Museum), on the invention of the Transistor
Klodian Coko (Tel Aviv University), on the Telephone
Frank Dittmann, Deutsches Museum, on the Transformer
Sungook Hong, Seoul National University, on Tireless communication
Benjamin Johnson, independent scholar, on Ammonia synthesis
Jad Kadan, Tel Aviv University, on early Computer technologies 
Cornelia Kemp , Deutsches Museum, on Photography
Rich Kremer, Dartmouth College, on the Conical pendulum
Timo Mappes, (Universität Jena and Deutsches Optisches Museum) on Ultramicroscopy
Rudolf Seising, Deutsches Museum, on Learning machines
Climério Silva Neto, Federal University of Bahia and Alexei Kojevnikov, University of British Columbia, on Semiconductor lasers
Anthony S. Travis, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, on the Industrialization of ammonia synthesis

Organizers: Johannes-Geert Hagmann, Deutsches Museum and Shaul Katzir, Tel Aviv University

Registration: forschungsinstitut@deutsches-museum.de

Programme and more